Hungry People Don’t Vote

Boris Johnson, UK Prime Minister

The Hartlepool byelection was a victory for hunger and poverty. It was a victory for tax cuts for the rich, insider dealing and the hidden national malaise that will deepen and worsen in the coming decade.

Hartlepool’s electorate consists of a little over 70,000 people.

Jill Mortimer for the Conservative Party won the byelection on 6 May with 15,529 votes. Labour’s Dr Paul Williams received 8,589 votes. The Lib-Dems scored 349 votes; the Greens 358 – 358 people in 70,000 showed they cared about melting ice caps, dying elephants and global warming.

Ms Mortimer’s 15,529 votes represents 22.18% of the population.

That means 1 in 5 people in Hartlepool are happy with Boris Johnson’s Conservative Party’s policies and general direction.

By coincidence – if that’s the right word – 1 in 5 people in Hartlepool live below the poverty line. Hunger, poverty and human suffering in this County Durham constituency is so entrenched, they have their own Hartlepool foodbank webpage – a Facebook group poverty web page and a Twitter account.

Before the coronavirus pandemic hit, almost a third of the children in Hartlepool were living in families classed as having low incomes.

‘With poverty hitting “devastatingly high” levels across the UK, charities are urging the Government to take action to prevent more families from falling into hardship when the crisis ends,’ writes Katie Williams in the Hartlepool Mail.  

In Hartlepool, 5,294 children aged under 16 were living in families with low incomes in 2019-20, up in 12 months from 26% to 29%, according to Department for Work and Pensions.

The Government has promised to level up and the levelling up thus far is in poverty levels.

Hungry People

Hungry people don’t vote. By keeping 20% of the people in poverty, you only need 20% of the people to vote to have a very high likelihood that the Conservative Party will remain in power forever.

What about the other 60%? Among them you have Labour supporters hanging on in quiet desperation, the sprinkling of Greens and Liberals, and a vast number of people living in apathy and depression.

How has this happened? In 1980, Mrs Thatcher began a programme of deregulation, denationalisation and the stealthy privatisation of the NHS – which has continued even during the 15 months of the pandemic.

Mrs Thatcher – like Mr Reagan in the United States – believed in trickle-down economics, that the wealthier people and banks get, the more money trickles down to the poor. This is a failed economic theory. The reverse is true. Money is sucked up, creating more millionaires and more donors to the Conservative Party who like what they’re getting.

Deregulation allowed companies to shift their production overseas where labour is cheaper, putting more workers at home out of work. Bank deregulation turned bankers into gamblers taking bigger and bigger risks until the bank crisis in 2007/08 required multi-billion pound handouts to the banks by George Osborne, the then Conservative Chancellor, and the beginning of austerity, driving more low income families into poverty.

Hungry people don’t vote. The Conservative Party knows that. It’s a shame the Labour Party doesn’t.

Hit FaceBook and the other social media icons to share.

The Hartlepool Food Bank is supported by The Trussell Trust. Visit 28 Church Street, Hartlepool,TS24 7DH; Tel: 01429 598404; email:





Posted in Blog.


  1. Speaking as someone whose failure to vote in the London Mayoral election may have contributed to the wholly undeserved re-election of Sadiq Khan, if you don’t vote, you have to live with the consequences.

    If you’re not unexpectedly 200 miles from the polling station, voting is easy enough in Britain.

    The winning candidate had 60% of the votes cast: what one might call a handy win. If the 45% non-voters had wanted a different MP for the next 3.5 years, they could have voted that person in 3:1 over the actual winner regardless of the other votes actually cast; but they didn’t. Even if the supposed hungry non-voters stayed home, it could still have been a good majority over Mortimer; but it wasn’t.

    By coincidence — if that’s the right word — this is the Hartlepool that is going to host a free-port area as part of the levelling-up/regeneration in the NE (promising “a tsunami of jobs” according to the Mayor of Teesside, as companies move their operations *on-shore*). And maybe some of the non-voters looked at the last election, when Labour only held on because the opposition was split, and called it a shoo-in for Mortimer without having to cast their own votes. They certainly weren’t going to vote for a party whose leaders can seem more concerned with failing to distinguish between Danny La Rue and Zsa Zsa Gabor, but perhaps that was your point.

  2. I think Clifford’s theory applies across a large part of the country. Hartlepool voters were sufficiently disillusioned with Labour to vote for the Conservatives. Labour must do honest self examination to understand why. Now we have to see if Boris Johnson’s jokey optimism and fluffy promises will actually bring improvements to the people of Hartlepool. I doubt it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *